Criminological Activity → Volume 1, Issue 2

The Experience of Applying Preventive Registration Mechanisms in Some Foreign Countries

27.06.2025 Research UZ 🔓 Open Access 👁 4 · 📥 1

Annotation / Abstract

Abstract. This article examines the experience of foreign countries in applying the preventive accounting mechanism. The author analyzed the features of the mechanism for preventive registration of persons who have committed crimes, offenses, or have been released from places of detention in the USA, Great Britain, Germany, France, Japan, the Republic of Korea, Singapore, Russia, and other countries. Based on the study of foreign experience, proposals and recommendations have been developed for improving the preventive accounting system in Uzbekistan.

Full text

AQSHda har bir shtatning o‘z probatsiya va shartli ozod qilish tizimi mavjud bo‘lib, ular orasida ma’lum farqlar mavjud. Federal darajada ham probatsiya xizmati mavjud, u federal jinoyatlar bo‘yicha sudlangan shaxslar bilan ishlaydi.

AQSHda profilaktik hisobga olish tizimi o‘z ichiga elektron nazorat tizimini, xavf darajasini baholash metodikasini, darhol aralashuv prinsipini, maxsus dasturlarni va jamoat tashkilotlari ishtirokini qamrab oladi.

Xususan, AQSHda profilaktik hisobda turgan shaxslarga nisbatan elektron bilaguzuklar, GPS-trekerlar va boshqa elektron nazorat vositalaridan keng foydalaniladi. Bu ularning harakatlanishini nazorat qilish va belgilangan cheklovlarga rioya qilishini ta’minlash imkonini beradi.

Shu bilan birga, AQSHning profilaktik hisobga olingan shaxslarning xavf darajasini baholashning ilmiy asoslangan tizimidan foydalanish amaliyoti diqqatga sazovor [4].

Bu tizim (Risk-Needs-Responsivity model — Xavf-ehtiyoj-moslashuvchanlik modeli) shaxsning qayta jinoyat sodir etish ehtimolini baholash va unga mos profilaktik choralarni belgilash imkonini beradi.

Mazkur mamlakatda profilaktik hisobda turgan shaxs belgilangan qoidalarni buzganda darhol aralashuv (swift, certain, and fair sanctions) tizimi ishga tushiriladi [5].

Bu yondashuv profilaktik hisobda turgan shaxs belgilangan qoidalarni buzgan taqdirda darhol, aniq va adolatli jazo choralarini qo‘llashni nazarda tutadi. Ushbu tizim AQSHning bir qator shtatlarida samarali natijalar berayotganligini qayd etish mumkin.

References

Foydalanilgan manbalar

  1. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasining “Huquqbuzarliklar profilaktikasi toʻgʻrisida”gi qonuni. 14.05.2014-yil, OʻRQ-371-son. https://www.lex.uz
  2. Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi Prezidentining “Jinoyat-ijroiya qonunchiligini tubdan takomillashtirish chora-tadbirlari toʻgʻrisida”gi qarori. 24.01.2018-yil, PQ-3484-son. https://www.lex.uz
  3. Deering J. Probation Practice and the New Penology: Practitioner Reflections. – London: Routledge, 2018. – 224 p.
  4. Farrington D.P., Welsh B.C. Crime Prevention and Public Policy // The Oxford Handbook of Crime Prevention / Ed. by M. Tonry. – Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2019. – P. 3-19.
  5. Frieder D. Electronic Monitoring in the Criminal Justice System. – New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2020. – 152 p.
  6. Kaeble D., Alper M. Probation and Parole in the United States, 2017-2018. – Washington: Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2020. – 25 p.
  7. Mallender J., Roberts E. A Comparative Analysis of Community-Based Alternatives to Incarceration: A Cross-National Study. – London: RAND Europe, 2021. – 180 p.
  8. Durnescu I. Pains of Probation: Effective Practice and Human Rights // International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology. – 2019. – Vol. 63. – №7. – P. 1056-1073.
  9. Криминология и противодействие преступности в немецкоязычных странах (Германия, Австрия, Швейцария). https://cyberleninka.ru
  10. О деятельности полиции Германии по профилактике незаконного оборота наркотических средств. Центр-Берег. http://center-bereg.ru/g152.html
  11. Ziyodullayev M.Z. Probatsiya xizmati: xorijiy tajriba va Oʻzbekistonda joriy etish masalalari // Huquq va burch. – 2019. – №6. – B. 42–46.
  12. Ismoilov I.U. Ozodlikdan mahrum etish joylaridan ozod qilingan shaxslarni ijtimoiy moslashtirish: xorijiy tajriba // Oʻzbekiston Respublikasi IIV Akademiyasining axborotnomasi. – 2021. – №4. – B. 38–44.
  13. Woo Y., Maguire E.R., Gau J.M. Direct and Indirect Effects of Procedural Justice on Cooperation and Compliance: Evidence from Korea // Police Practice and Research. – 2020. – Vol. 21. – №4. – P. 365-380.
  14. Robinson G., McNeill F., Maruna S. Understanding Desistance from Crime. – Maidenhead: Open University Press, 2018. – 212 p.
  15. Горбань Д.В., Стрелков Д.О., Кутаков Н.Н. Профилактический учет в системе мер предупреждения пенитенциарной преступности: проблемные вопросы и пути их решения // Вестник Самарского юридического института. – 2018. – №4 (30).
  16. Смирнов А. М., Андреев С. Н. Совершенствование правового регулирования профилактического учета осужденных к лишению свободы // Ведомости УИС. – 2016. – №6 (169).
🔍 View online 📥 Download PDF

APA

Naimov, Raximjon (2025). The Experience of Applying Preventive Registration Mechanisms in Some Foreign Countries. Criminological Activity, 1(2), 121–127. https://doi.org/

Vancouver

Naimov, Raximjon. The Experience of Applying Preventive Registration Mechanisms in Some Foreign Countries. Criminological Activity. 2025;1(2):121-127.